Archive for the ‘National Government’ Category

House of Lords Seminar on Brain Development

Sunday, July 11th, 2010

Lord Hameed held a Seminar at the House of Lords on 14th June to raise awareness about cerebral palsy and allied disorders of brain development. Lord Hameed is the President of the Little Foundation, a sister charity that is specifically concerned with research on the cause and prevention of cerebral palsy and the allied disorders.

He spoke eloquently of the lack of interest on prevention by the research councils and NHS research arm which Sir David Cooksey described in his report to the Treasury that only 2% of the total research budget was spent on research into prevention. The reason for his report was to recommend ways of stemming the rising costs of the NHS.

The Little Foundation initiated a multi-centre study across the Europe using magnetic resonance imaging to assess the origin of the brain damage. The result demonstrated that in the majority of cases the lesions could be identified as happening well before the birth date. That means they were not due to obstetric mishap. As Professor Polani’s research could not identify any genetic cause, the cause had to be associated with fetal nutritional and or infectious problems.

If this government wishes to save money prevention is the way to do it. Cerebral palsy costs the UK about £4 billion a year: a cost that is disproportionately high because of its life long impact. The incidence has not changed over the last several decades but there has been a marked and sinister rise in mental ill health. The DoH calculated the cost of mental
ill health in the UK was £77 billion in 2007, greater than the cost of heart disease and cancer combined.

Lord Hameed was followed by Professor Mark Johnson and Dr Enitan Ogundipe of Imperial College who outlined the problems associated with low birthweight and prematurity. Professor Johnson described the very high prevalence of
cerebral palsy on preterm and very low birthweight infants as a major clue as to discovering the cause which could lead to prevention. He referred to poor maternal/fetal nutrition leading to chronic diseases in later life. He identified the brain specific fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid a deficiency of which in the modern food system was as a potential culprit. It is both required for brain structure and function and is also anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombus. Dr. Ogundipe then discussed the issue as they affect the development of the children which apart from the extreme of 24 hour nursing care include physical disabilities, behavioral disorders, attention deficit disorders, poor learning in school which leads to poor achievement in life. Lord Hameed had pointed out that this cluster of poor abilities leads to the cyclical cementing of poverty. Cerebral palsy is the tip of an iceberg. Professor Michael Crawford ended by re-iterating the gravity of the rise in brain disorders and mental ill health and suggested that last century food policy had mistakenly focused on protein and calories and body growth. However, there are different principles for the growth of the brain and the body as the material of the brain is largely fat which is especially rich in brain specific essential fatty acids. Our species is characterized by the brain not the body. There needs to be a new paradigm for food policy which prioritizes the needs of the brain. He suggested ways this could be done.

The presentations were followed by an hour long discussion of the issues raised and what needs to be done. Further information from Professor Crawford.

Child Health Partnerships: a review of program characteristics, outcomes and their relationship.

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Novel approaches are increasingly employed to address the social determinants of health of children world-wide. Such approaches have included complex social programs involving multiple stakeholders from different sectors jointly working together (hereafter Child Health Partnerships).

There was evidence of success in several major areas from the formation of effective joint operations of partners in different partnership models to improvement in both child wellbeing and parenting. There is emerging evidence that Child Health Partnerships are cost-effective. Population characteristics and local contexts need to be taken into account in the introduction and implementation of these programs.

via Pubmed Central

Royal College of GPs warns over new health visitors

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

The Royal College of GPs says thousands of new health visitors whom the government plans to recruit should not solely be placed in children’s centres.

Over 4,000 more health visitors have been promised in England, focused in Sure Start centres.

GPs say there is already a breakdown in communication with health visitors who work in the centres, and placing more there would make it worse.

But children’s charities say parents need a more informal approach.

via BBC News

Scottish government agrees breast is best.

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

In Written Answers, Shona Robison (SNP) said,

There is a large and robust body of evidence demonstrating the short and long term health benefits of breastfeeding for both mothers and infants, including evidence from the World Health Organization, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD and the World Cancer Research Fund.

The Scottish Government has adopted as policy the World Health Organization guidance recommending exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of an infant’s life.

via TheyWorkForYou

US Health Reform Law Includes Many Benefits for Pregnant Women, New Mothers

Friday, June 11th, 2010

June 8, 2010 — Several provisions in the federal health reform law PL 111-148 will significantly improve health insurance coverage and support services for pregnant women and new mothers, who frequently face “seriously deficient” options in the current market, the Washington Post reports.

According to the Post, about 85% of women have given birth by age 44. However, some insurers consider pregnancy a pre-existing condition and charge pregnant women higher premiums or refuse to cover costs associated with childbirth. Currently, low-income pregnant women can receive coverage through Medicaid, but they usually lose it 60 days after giving birth unless they are very poor, the Post reports.

Starting this fall, all new health insurance plans will be required to cover certain preventive screenings and services — such as folic acid supplements and counseling for smoking cessation — for pregnant women at no additional cost. In addition, Medicaid will begin covering smoking cessation counseling and drug therapy for pregnant women. The law also includes a provision to require employers to provide paid breaks for women to express breastmilk, as well as a location that is not a bathroom to do so.

via National Partnership for Women & Families

Family plans set out by coalition

Monday, May 24th, 2010

# “Couple penalty” in tax system to be reduced

# Sure Start programme “more focused on neediest families”

# 4,200 extra Sure Start health visitors

# Goal of ending child poverty in the UK by 2020 remains

# Promotion of a system of flexible parental leave

# Review of family law to increase use of mediation and give greater access rights to parents and grandparents

# Review of vetting and barring system

via BBC News

Mother and Child Foundation Calls on Parties to Support A New Way to Nutrition and Health.

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

The Mother and Child Foundation calls upon the leaders of political parties, and on candidates for both national and local government to declare their support for the Foundation’s campaign for better nutrition for expectant and nursing mothers, and for their dependant children.

The evidence is now accepted that poor nutrition during pregnancy causes life-long damage to the unborn child. Lack of key nutrients cripples brain development at the root; at its most extreme (which is becoming distressingly common) causing conditions like Cerebral Palsy, and even in milder forms destroying learning potential, and condemning a generation to lives of poverty.

The removal of Home Economics and Nutrition from the standard curriculum in the early 1970s set a time bomb ticking in the heart of our communities, and we now have a generation who, despite token efforts of cookery lessons, and despite the odd highly publicised campaign in politically well placed schools, cannot plan a balanced diet. We have an underclass, given a pittance barely enough to survive, who cannot afford good food, and do not know how to make the most of what they can afford.

The result is now falling around our ears – a generation of parents living on refined starch and fats, simultaneously growing obese whilst their bodies fail them through malnutrition. We have ever higher rates of metabolic disorders such as diabetes. We have massive and increasing rates of poor mental health. We have rates of seriously underweight babies which are an international disgrace, comparable only with the Balkan states recovering from civil war. We have a mental health system barely able to cope with those in extremis, and without the resources to help them before they reach that point.

And we have more of the same to come, with the next generation of that underclass being fed on what their parents can afford to fill their bellies, without the knowledge or the money to give them the nutrients which they need. Children who start out handicapped by poor nutrition, who will grow to become adults who need support just to function, let alone become productive members of society.

We need to address the problem where it begins. A recent study in London found that nearly three quarters of the mothers studied were significantly deficient in vitamin D. Many were suffering with anaemia, due to lack of iron and B vitamins. All of these affect their babies, with anaemia being particularly damaging to the brain.

Numerous trials (for example those recently reported in Cardiff, and the East End of London) show that measures as simple as providing pregnant and nursing mothers with free vitamins can produce benefits for their children, and through developing their potential, the nation.

We need nationally set programmes and standards for the teaching of Nutrition and Home Economics, so that children are empowered to make decisions that will affect their own life, health and that of their children. We must invest in prevention, which is the surest way to save costs of the Health Service. Yet only 2% of the total budget for research by the MRC and NHS is spent on preventive research. The old maxim says “a stitch in time saves nine”: as a nation, we need to invest in health which means prevention as a priority. That will save ten times the cost in mental and other ill health issues, and the social costs linked to chronic ill health, especially mental ill health.

The old way are health costs spiralling upwards to try to serve more and more chronic disease, obesity and mental ill health. Let’s have new way ! It is time for a paradigm shift that will save money and enhance the health, intelligence and productive capacity of the nation.

We need to start with the mother and child. We need nutrition, and we need education: empower children. Who is with us?

Politics Show – Tories outline ‘health premium’

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

The Shadow Health Minister says the most deprived areas of the country should get more money to improve public health.

via BBC News.

BBC News – Giving new life to the role of the father

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

More fathers than ever before may attend the birth of their child, but the government is keen to involve them even more closely in pregnancy, labour and the aftermath as part of its Green Paper on the family.

via BBC News – Giving new life to the role of the father.